In the video of the OW10 Moth sail I said I would report on its performance, so here we go.

The OW10 was designed in response to the hype of getting the power down low, theoretically having the power but be easier to manage. So a shortening of the rig by 300mm pushed the boom length out buy a further 250mm to maintain maximum sail area but lowering the COE. The sail design was the same as the OW9 except for the difference in aspect ratio so a direct comparison could be made in testing the effect of lower aspect.

In testing we found that in lighter conditions the boat would get onto the foil in just the same manner so overall power was ok, but the rig/boat would come back over you in lulls more quickly due to the power being lower, so at that moment acted like a small sail.

 In medium more consistent conditions the sails were very even, except that initially the OW10 felt a bit more bound up. We had kept the hounds up at the same height as the OW9 so you could use the same set of stays, but then lowered the hounds 300mm (now the same distance from the tip) and lowered the spreaders 150mm producing same softer head support as the OW9 and gust response improved to the level of the OW9.

 In heavier conditions with the sails flattened off (heads flat and feathering) the OW10 did not depower as well as the OW9 as the longer boom meant you were actually left with a bigger area of sail left with power. So too much power is too much even down low.

In the end we cut the foot length of the OW10 down to the same as the OW9 and faired the leach though to the head which meant we now had a smaller sail which was easier to manage top end, not rocket science in the end. The cut down OW10 is surprisingly efficient coming down the wind range and is now available as the  OW12 7.7m2 area small sail.

So, for Perth conditions, ( ie: the Worlds 2019) what do I recommend?

 – sailors 75kg or less, the OW 12 will probably be your main choice for the usual windy seabreezes at that time of year.  But you’ll want the full size OW11 as well for the light days.

Heavier sailors, over 75kg will be happy tearing around on the OW11, but if it blows over 25 knots and they keep racing, it will be handy to have the OW12 in your quiver.

Testing the low aspect OW11

Testing the low aspect OW11

2019 Moth Main Profile

2019 Moth Main Profile


The Effects of Gearing Speed.

Since last writing lots of testing has been done and a better understanding of exactly what gearing speed effects is emerging. The general understanding is that slow gearing is fast due to minimal flap movement but control is compromised, and fast gearing is slow but you gain more control.

With the cam you can target specific areas in lift delivery, lift control from lowriding to levelling off to ride height is pretty sorted so I concentrated on the ride height zone gearing through to off and made it 1mm per 10degs of wand movement, the speed of 1, all the way to off. In early testing I felt this was pretty good and even got the impression that lift was stronger with low gearing speed due to less variation, but this is not so.

Slow gearing makes the setting of your overall lift and AOA much more critical due to less control movement, rudder trim inputs become more frequent so your head is in the boat more trying to stay in the groove and height to windward is harder to maintain so you end up off the pace overall. The boat was silky smooth through the water and speed was ok, I felt in control enough but struggled with good height to windward. I have fitted the boat out with some of the best known foils as a constant to test with too so knew what I was looking for was going to come from somewhere else.

I started to make some enquiries with various fast mates using standard systems to try and get an idea of what their gearing was at ride height, - short answer was they had no idea and generally weren’t that interested in working out what it was, it felt right so they were happy, which is fair enough. So I had to get an idea of what their gearing was by observation of their boats and comments about how much wand travel they had at times of successful gearing speed. What I found was that their slow gearing was much faster at ride height than what I was using with the cam. The cams ability to deliver strong early lift/gearing then back off gearing made this possible, if the gearing was that slow right through the range you’d never get high enough or have enough control.

For example the Mach 2 bowsprit delivers a speed of approx. 5mm per 10degs of wand rotation atride height and an overall movement of approx. 30mm, hence the reason to gear down at the bellcrank, the flap can’t take much more than 14mm overall movement. Looking at where they generally have the bellcrank set they would be using gearing in the range of 2-3mm per 10degs of wand rotation. So the cam I was using was the C6 with the ride height speed of 1 and its overall flap movement was down to 10.5mm, I had also made the C6.2 with a turn off notch at the end to flick the flap off an extra 2mm and a C6.4 with 4mm extra. First I took the C6.2 and altered the curve through ride height to off to be an even speed, the extra 2mm off through this movement increased the ride height speed to 1.5 with an overall movement of 12.5mm.

I then went sailing and immediately the boat was easier to keep in the groove upwind, particularly in gusty conditions, and upwind performance improved. Gybing the boat flying high was safer too. The boat was still feeling pretty smooth with that gearing, this cam was now the C7.

With that improvement I then went the next step and re-profiled the C6.4 cam in a similar way down to its turnoff position, this gave a constant ride height speed of 2 and an overall movement of 14mm, this is now the C8 cam. Back on the water the improvement again was evident, most importantly height to windward improved dramatically.

Yes the boat now rides much bumpier (mind you I had become used to the gearing of 1) but the effect is that the boat has more lift with control. Speed comes from being able to fly high more constantly reducing the drag from verticals and overall lift and so height to windward is better due to the flap turning on more in response to the boat dropping.

So I am happy at this stage with the C8 cam for use with foils that have a flap area to mainfoil of 37-40% (most foils at the moment). The basic makeup of 14mm of overall movement, ride heightgearing of 2 that speeds up to 3.3 below ride height to get you onto full lift earlier feels about right. I have made a C9 cam with 1.5mm more overall movement for foils with smaller flaps like the Macita.

It’s a bit ironic that foils that have smaller flaps to be fast then have less control and then need more flap movement, but there you go. It is most likely that you could gear down more at ride height if theflap area increases in foil design, time will tell, but the C6 & C7 cams are there waiting.

Phil ‘Bugs’ Smith Design 2019 Contact us to order yours BugsCAM

Phil ‘Bugs’ Smith Design 2019 Contact us to order yours BugsCAM


The BugsCAM is the heart of your boat. It is easy to fit and will give you unbelievable control of your boat.

All MOTHS should fit the system this way, including homebuilds.

The best way to install a CAM system into your Moth is how I have done it on my own boat using the SERVICE TUBE KIT.

Advantages being:

If you fit the service tube through from the bow, the control rod goes down this straight to the bell crank, also your wand control lines can use this tube to enter the boat cockpit (very neat). The bowsprit slips into this and is a very strong attachment method.

The Mach 2 kit and the one  on the Bladerider (see pics attached)  (the old setup from my boat) are bolt on setups that utilise the stock production control rod for ease of fitting the system (no boat mods). This is ok but you have to make sure that the control rod is nice and free running.

The service tube kit includes service tube, adjustable control rod kit and bellcrank with the bowsprit, cam gear, adjustable wand and control lines.

MACH 2 KIT includes Mach 2 moulded bowsprit, control rod extension, bellcrank, bowsprit, cam gear, adjustable wand and control lines.

Hole through bulkhead entering cockpit (in front of mast step in this case)

Hole through bulkhead entering cockpit (in front of mast step in this case)

Service tube glued into place at cockpit end

Service tube glued into place at cockpit end

Service tube exiting bow (glued in position)

Service tube exiting bow (glued in position)

Adjustable part of control rod in cockpit (control rod passes through mast stump as mid length guide)

Adjustable part of control rod in cockpit (control rod passes through mast stump as mid length guide)

Et..voila! BugsCAM neatly installed in service tube.

Et..voila! BugsCAM neatly installed in service tube.

Latest update on the BUGS CAM

BUGS CAM (a cam style control system for foiling boats)

Up until now the main method of flap control for the main foil on Moths (and other T-foil boats) has been via a form of lever or other attachment to the wand that scribes an arc to deliver an initial control movement through the control rod to the flap.
As the boat rises the wand drops and swings forward taking the control rod with it, in turn reducing the flap angle on the main foil so eventually lift is reduced and the boat stops rising when lift pressure equalises with the weight it has to carry (we call that ride height). The wand is usually at an angle of approx. 40-45degs back from vertical trailing on the water’s surface at this point so if the boat tries to rise further the wand will continue to move forward further reducing lift and bringing the boat back to a safe level. If the boat drops the wand is forced back and more lift comes on to keep the boat up. Over the years a lot of work has been put into working out how to deliver an action or timing of movement that gives the best control and fast trim.


Depending on where the forward control lever is angled in relation to the wand determines what part of the arc you use (there is approx. 80degs of wand movement available to usefully utilise) and this can to some degree vary the timing of movement from the wand to the flap. (See Fig.1) As the wand drops (with the boat rising), using the rear quarter of the arc (A) flap movement is slow to begin with and speeds up towards ride height. This effect is further enhanced by the fact that the wand is acting in the same way in relation to the water level, as the boat rises the wands action speeds up. So with this action lift is held on longer and control action is faster at ride height. Using the lower quarter of the arc (B) gives the most linear (even) movement through the range, and using the forward quarter (C) flap movement comes off fast then slows toward ride height.
Behind this is the bell crank, a two armed 90 degree lever that links the control rod with the final pushrod that goes down the centreboard to the flap. The length of either the wand lever or the control rod arm of the bell crank can be adjustable to change the ratio between them and so also vary the amount of movement delivered to the flap from the wand, this is what we refer to as the gearing speed. The control rod between the wand lever and bell crank is also adjustable, this independently tunes the amount of flap that is forced on and so is a lift control, along with a wand that is adjustable in length and a lift/ride height control as well. These last two cross over in their jobs, and adjusting them can also effect the speed of control delivery. If you back off rod length and so reducing lift, but maintain lift with wand length the wand will be longer and angled back more under the boat and the action of the wand is then slower. Increasing lift with the control rod while shortening the wand to maintain correct ride height brings the wand further forward and the action is faster. Lots of stuff to fiddle with.
The main problem using the arc system is that overall the control movements are too linear or smooth to give us the control we always imagine we need, that’s why we include dials and gearing systems to try to fill in the gaps if possible, the problem being that you can get very lost in the numbers and just plain confused in moments of extreme manoeuvring and you have an intense time helming your way out of trouble. Fast trim at ride height is the slowest control speed possible to maintain height control (minimal flap movement is less drag and maintains a more constant lift) combined with as much lift as you can handle dialled in to the foil. This is fine if the conditions are glamour but there’s not much of a safety net if things turn nasty or you have some full on manoeuvring to do. So you pull some strings and rearrange your settings to increase the gearing (speed) to gain some more control, but then you upset your nice smooth fast trim with a slower bumpier one. You rob Peter to pay Paul.

So, enter the cam. In simple terms it lets you escape the restrictive control patterns of the arc stylesystem and design in better control timing and movement. What we need is for the flap to remainon full for longer for good initial lift then to switch off to the correct amount of lift and controlmovement at ride height to maintain good trim and speed, this along with control built in to best deal with the more hairy moments we experience.
Let’s first look at the simple makeup of the system with Fig.2


1. The cam is 3mm alloy plate cut to its control profile and incorporates a May stick that shock
cord is attached to pull the wand onto the water’s surface at the right pressure. (Tension 1.)
The cam is locked onto the shaft that the wand pivots on and so turns with the wand.
2. The cam follower is a ball bearing pulley wheel set in the end of a 20mm plastic rod section
that in turn runs in two round Teflon plain bearings now within a bowsprit tube.
3. The control rod is a stiff carbon tube (windsurfer batten tube is good) that runs in a direct
line from the cam follower through the bowsprit tube and “service” tube into the boat and
to the bell crank. The rear section of the control rod should be adjustable for fine tune of lift,
but doesn’t need to be adjustable while sailing.
4. The bell crank at the centreboard head should be approx. 1:1 ratio and its’s good to have the
control rod arm extend up a bit to fix a second shock cord control (Tension 2) to make sure
the cam follower chases the cam all the way to off (flap right up). If your control rod is nice
and free running then this is almost not needed, there is plenty of flap pressure all the way
to the end of the ride height zone to keep the cam follower in contact with the cam at all
times, It’s mainly to guarantee the full switch to off! (there is very minimal flap pressure
5. Then it’s pushrod down to the flap.
Fig. 2 corresponds to Full Lift Zone in Fig. 5
The boat has risen on full lift to the end of the full lift zone 1 on the cam, the wand paddle is approx.
200-300mm from the bottom of the boat at this stage (this zone is a continuous radius, no action, so the cam has held the follower still and the flap stays on full), the cam follower is about to roll through zone 2, the dial down of lift to arrest the boat at ride height.
Fig. 3 corresponds to Ride Height Zone in Fig.5
The boat has settled onto ride height zone 3 and it’s hear that all the planets must line up. The goal
hear is to develop the slowest control speed possible that enables ride height to be maintained. This is the time that a foil you have chosen of the right size/type for your weight is set to be in its most efficient section for performance. This ride height zone has to be as large as possible.
Fig. 4 Corresponds to Full Off Zone in Fig. 5


The boat has strayed up too high and the wand has flicked right forward to full off on the cam at the end of zone 4. The boat will be dropped back to ride height. You can design a curve at the end of this movement to have the boat react as you want. It’s best if this is like a “notch” at the end so the cam follower stays well away from it during normal ride height.
Comparing the Cam to the Lever System.
The overall movement of the flap at its control point (where the pushrod attaches to the flap) can be up to 14mm max at the flap. With the Cam you can design to this or any amount of overall movement required for a particular foil. The Cam is like a curved graph so we can now see what that movement and its speed is.

Let’s start a new language by calling it a speed over a duration of rotation, say 10degrees.

In Fig. 6 Control Speed you can see a cam profile and the cam follower in ride height zone.


3. Over the duration of this zone the cam follower moves the flap at a speed of 1mm per 10degs of rotation, so we can call that speed 1 and it’s linear over the whole zone, this appears to be a good gearing at ride height. If the boat rises and the cam goes all the way to the end of zone 4 the flap drops off 2mm (or even more if you feel you need it) over the last 12degs. So that’s an average speed of just under 2, but it isn’t linear as its switch off speed increases towards full off (With the last flick forward of the wand the flap goes off like a switch). If the boat drops from ride height the cam rotates back bringing the follower In contact with zone 2 that immediately jumps to a speed of 3.3 over the first 10degs back but slows to a speed of 2.1 that tapers to 0 (no movement) as it moves onto zone 1 of
full lift. This helps keep the boat from dropping too far and pushes it back to ride height as quickly as possible.
Compare that action to curve A which roughly shows the more linear action of the lever system dialled back to the same optimum ride height speed of 1. You can see that it lacks the handy lift switch off (a lesser issue) and the reserve of lift close at hand if the boat dives (a big issue). Usually to combat this when conditions get rough gearing is increased and the result is curve B. As you can see there is now full flap movement to off and more lift available sooner but ride height speed has now increased to 2, too much for a smooth ride height trim but still doesn’t match the response speed of the cam which can be 3.3 when needed.

Sailing With Bugscam.

Wand in the classic 40deg ride height position

Wand in the classic 40deg ride height position

On the water once the boat has been set up right all you need to do is adjust wand length to whatever ride height is desired and do a bit of rudder trim. On occasions I may tweak control rod length between races (just some fine tune, usually after changing between foils and I’m just resetting ride height trim to suit) but I don’t touch it during racing, my boat is free of excess control lines. Downwind it’s really interesting to play with the combination of wand length and rudder trim. If you keep the wand long and you are high you tend to use a bit more rudder to keep the boat planted. This pushes the bow down and the wand further back meaning the cam follower starts to engage with the faster zone 2 with plenty of control action and feels OK. But if you shorten the wand to drop the boat a bit more
then back off the rudder lift, the bow comes up letting the wand move forward so the cam follower stays on the geared down and very slippery zone 3, it feels like the wand is out of the water but it’s still in and active. This is the trim to target up and downwind, the control zones are there ready to assist when needed, remember it’s the wands position relative to the cam zones that you should focus on.
Sailing with low gearing is really very stable, with less reaction to waves it’s like the waves disappear and so have less impact on the boat, the reserves of lift control need to be close enough to either side of the what we could call the ride height “platform” and there ready to put the boat back on the platform only if it strays off it while gybing or dealing with troughs or backs of larger waves, the extra lift coming in strongly is also a benefit while foil tacking (badly in my case) I fitted the cam system to a bowsprit on my boat and did it in a way that utilised the old control rod when the wand was mounted on the side of the bow (this is how the boat was in Garda) but in testing after we came back I had come to the realisation that I was getting some deflection in the new longer control rod and with that a loss of lift at critical times, this leads to miss information between the cam and flap. Upwind just when you need to be pushing off good solid lift to stay in trim it fades and temps you to dial in more lift than you need, then on occasions you have too much when the pressure backs off and the rod straightens, downwind the boat can press down too much and then rebound back too much causing you to look else ware for solutions. I have recently fitted out the boat in the way I had always intended it to be done if you were building a boat from scratch (it was really easy in the end and the way it should be done on any existing boat) and the results were incredible, so much more stability with the boat doing what it’s being told, a good lesson in making sure that no matter what control system or foils you use, any loss of lift due to flex in control rods, wands, flaps and foils cannot
be tolerated. The change was removing the old control rod that came in on a slight angle from the bow side and fitted a “service” tube from the bow to the bulkhead lining up with the bell crank. The bowsprit tube now slides into this at the bow and is a very strong attachment method. A new control rod of stiff carbon tube now goes from the end of the cam follower straight to just before the mast stump (the adjustable wand control lines also go down this tube and into the cockpit, much neater), then it becomes a short section of 5mm S/S rod and passes through a 5.5mm hole in the mast stump, this acts as a midway low friction guide. The end of this S/S rod is threaded into another section of carbon rod that continues to the bell crank connection fitting that is threaded in the opposite direction
and this becomes the adjustable part of the control rod. Getting that sorted eliminated any loss of lift due to rod flex and keeps rod movement friction to a minimum. After this change I sailed with the same cam and foil and couldn’t believe the improvement. As the boat was more stable without the lift changing under load I was confident to re-profile the cam with a larger ride height zone 3, this keeps the faster control gearing zones either side more distant creates a larger “sweet spot” of fast trim to aim for.

Tuning to the cam

Switching to a cam system means taking on board the fact that the cam can deliver the best manual control movement possible over the full range using a wand as a sensor. It’s all about developing a tuned boat before the race starts and then getting down to some heads up racing rather that your head in the boat pulling strings when you can. If you feel you need to introduce adjustable gearing in to survive or go faster, then the cam profile is not correct, so make it correct. You can develop a cam curve that uses other controls while sailing (other than the wand and rudder trim), and get better results than with a lever system, but that’s not the point of going to a cam. It’s about accurate simplicity. The only time you should adjust bell crank ratio is to fine tune match the overall cam movement to
the flaps overall flap movement. If the cam has 14mm in its design and you only need 12mm the control rod arm connection point can be moved up to gear down its overall movement to 12mm, or re-profile the cam to suit. This is checked before you go out. On the water you check that the foil is making the correct lift at ride height. If the wand it too far back
and engaging too much with the zone 2 lift bump you need to increase control rod length to move the wand further forward (approx. 40degs back from vertical) and the cam follower will move closer to the centre of the ride height zone. Then it’s just wand length to suit height and you’re ready to start (it’s just like going out and setting the jib cars)
So far all foils I have used with the cam have responded in the same way to the same cam. Mind you, they all had flap area to main foil ratios that where similar. Any foils that are pushing the boundaries of minimal flap area along with fused tips are going to be hard to get control from regardless of the control system choice. Foils of this nature are fast because they actually water down the effects of bad control systems input and would be less effected buy lift leakage purely because the flap area is smaller and so less of the overall foil area or amount of lift is disturbed. My take on this is that if the control movement is minimal enough at ride height and the foil flap is stiff enough, then the flap is
almost “invisible” in the ride height zone 3 and so can be kept at a more effective ratio of area to actually be of assistance when needed for control. A larger flap needs to move less to have an effect on control than a smaller one so if correct attention to detail is observed in construction of the foils and cam speed I fail to see a problem in having a larger flap. Then you have speed and control, this will become more obvious with time.
To date I have decreased the amount of overall flap I require from 13mm down to 10mm, most of this has come from taking the slow gearing right forward and having no emergency off “notch” right at the end, having too much turn off can drop the boat too much and then the boat has to recover from that drop, the rebound can be a killer.
So a slow ride height gearing is very stable but it can’t cope with sudden drops in height, with the cam system the lift bump behind ride height quickly turns on lots of lift to arrest the drop then quickly turns back off to kill the lift at ride height. This minimizes boat drop and rebound, the latter the reason why I’ve now been able to eliminate the late extra flap switch off on my boat, preferring the boat float out to off and rely on the right amount of rudder trim to come down more slowly to ride height and not slam down and need full lift to stop nose diving or a big rebound later. (A trip to the moon) In the future it may be good to work on a hydraulic line to the flap from the cam follower. It gets rid
of the bell crank and any possible control rod flex and friction issues and would allow centreboards to be raised while still connected to the cam system. That’s one of the beauties of keeping the system at a 1:1 ratio.
Cat classes that want to foil should really be using twin t-foils that are angled out about 8-10degs (around the angle Moths naturally cant to windward) and have control systems like this. On multi- crewed boats if they use a hydraulic line they could raise the windward board if they wanted. They would foil earlier and safer but I guess they’ll work that out in time too.

Safer foiling everyone,
Phil “Bugs” Smith
Western Australia
April 2018 (this article published in Seahorse Magazine April 2018)


The BUGS cam system is now ready to roll, part of the wait was due to coming up with better and simpler ways to put it all together,  all with the focus on reliability and ease of assembly.

Along with the cam is a nice telescopic adjustable wand, a must if you want to go out the full 500mm on the sprit and stay within the rules.

Main cam parts

Main cam parts

Some of the vital cam parts, clockwise from the top we have the the cap which houses the cam and wand axle, the carbon bowsprit tube, cam follower and plane bearings that fit neatly in the bowsprit tube (control rod can come off the side or screw directly into the rear of the follower), the cam and holder and finally the wand axle.

Business end assembled

Business end assembled

The full Mach 2 kit.

The full Mach 2 kit.

Prowler Zero short bowsprit, lift on.

Prowler Zero short bowsprit, lift on.

Lift off.

Lift off.

Above is my Zero with short bowsprit (just long enough to house all the cam gear) This shows external pushrod connection to cam follower. Pushrod can also screw into the rear of cam follower and go straight down bowsprit and into the boat.

Please excuse alteration mess from earlier R & D work.

Bell crank and push rod.

Bell crank and push rod.

Bell crank is fixed at 1 : 1 ratio and push rod is set to length for max flap through lift off zone. Shock cord is connected to top of bell crank to keep cam follower pressured to cam. If your push rod runs free enough flap pressure is almost enough to do this alone but depending on what AoA you use it gets light towards off so you really need the extra shove. Recommend that you don't load this up to double as your pressure to hold the wand on the water, use the built-in Maystick on the cam to set up your wand pressure separately.

BUGSCAM SYSTEM can be ordered through Avalon Sail Co. Just call the office   or

BUGS CAM: A cam style control system for foiling boats

Up until now the main method of flap control for the main foil on Moths (and other T-foil boats) has been via a form of lever or other attachment to the wand that scribes an arc. Depending on what part of the arc you choose to use, can vary the style or timing of movement from the wand to the flap. As the wand drops, using the rear quarter of the arc, flap movement is slow to begin with and speeds up towards ride height. Using the lower quarter gives the fastest and most linear movement through the range and using the forward quarter, flap movement comes off fast then slows toward ride height.

Now, what we are after is for the boat to have strong lift to ride height and good control when at ride height, simple. Looking at the choices of arc positions the rear arch at first seems the right way to go, it holds lift on well and shuts off lift reasonably too, and it is ok. The lower arc choice turns off lift too fast and the movement is too linear (explanation of that coming). Using the forward arc works well if you jam on so much lift (with the dial increasing control rod length) that the wand can’t go back any more than the paddle being 200-300mm below the bottom of the boat. This means that you have max lift to break free of the water and then lift comes off quickly to ride height, lift is also available quickly on the drop of the boat. Downside, the wand jamming back on the system can cause failures and there is some drag when not foiling (not that that matters much).

The main problem using the arc system is that the control movements are too linear or smooth to give us the control we imagine we need, that’s why we include dials and gearing systems to help, to fill in the gaps if possible, the problem being that you can get very lost in the numbers and just plain confused in moments of extreme stress (you know what I mean!) To have strong lift to ride height then have the boat settle to ride height with good control (that’s where gearing comes into it) is not a linear action overall.

So, enter the cam. In simple terms it lets you escape the restrictive control patterns of the arc style system and design better control timing and movement. What I was after was for the flap to remain on full for longer then switch off to the correct position and timing to maintain trim, in affect creating a better, stronger bubble or cushion of lift to sail on.

To start with I measured the amount of movement in the flap at the point that the control rod connects, my foil was using around 12-13mm from full on to full off. This then was to be the range of movement that the cam needed. The bell crank then needed to be made a 1 : 1 ratio so that  what was happening at the cam was what was happening at the flap (you could eliminate the bell crank altogether with a cable type connection to bring the direct drive through). Next was the design of the cam, with 13mm or so of movement to build in, the choice of radius was important. If you go too small the “ramp” from on to off can be too steep which causes some basic mechanical issues and control could get harsh and twitchy particularly in the direction of lift coming back on, in reality the larger the cam the easier it is to “tune” your designed control curves and the action is smoother and engineering wise more robust.

So I built the cam system with all these factors in mind and cobbled it all onto the bow of a Prowler Zero. This boat has been a bit of a test hack so was sporting a good foil to work with. In my mind things should go like this, put foil in boat and connect control rod, make sure you have full flap with wand back for take-off (control rod is still adjustable but no dial), throw boat in the water and go sailing only needing to adjust rudder trim and wand length to suit, no dial or gearing adjustment necessary. Now on the first test sail the first thing that the cam made stand out was that I had way too much AOA on the foil, the boat was sluggish getting up and pressured I could drive it off the foil, it was stalling, also with the much shortened bell crank my control rod was bending under the extra leverage the flap had and so I was getting mixed messages back from the boat. So AOA was then backed off to a new sane amount and I modified the control rod set up to suit. Next test sail the boat just jumped up to ride height now I had found a more suitable AOA for the foil, switch off at ride height wasn’t aggressive enough so a re-profiling of the cam was needed (the non-linear nature of the right numbers was even greater than I anticipated), I did however rotate the cam back a bit to address this on the day and got things working quite well, I was a happy camper.

I made a few more changes to the system to improve reliability and guarantee smooth operation, re-profiled the cam now I was getting a better idea of the numbers that give the intended control, and hit the water again. Well…. It was as good as I’d imagined. The boat was strong in lift with great control and ability to maintain trim, it is much faster now too as the foil is in a much better section at ride height, and tacking and jibing is far better too, going down the Swan River in 25kts+ wind doing 30 odd knots is amazing. I keep getting nervous thinking somethings going to give but it doesn’t, the brain snaps before the boat and going into a jibe is now a time for quiet contemplation before you unleash it on the next leg!

But racing is where it counts, and I’m happy to say that the old Prowler is totally on the pace and some. As I’m getting more familiar with the way the boat trims and its new capabilities’, and of cause getting my own act together again after winter, I’m getting harder to beat, and the Kiddies don’t like it, being pasted by a 56 year old grandad is not high on their list.

What I like is that the boat has become so easy to sail, I’m happy to say all I need is rudder trim and wand length control. There is no need for an adjustable rod (dial) or gearing while sailing. Set the rod length for max flap and you’re done, check you have the best AOA for your foil and your weight at lift off (now made easier by the extended controlled lift zone, no flap comes off in this), you need to find the most minimal AOA with satisfactory lift which then not only lifts better but the section will be better at ride height too, and less flap up is needed to keep you down so more control also.  Dial in the cam to switch off as late as possible and then set up the ramp off curve to give the desired gearing for control. I cannot see at this stage why you would need to change the gearing once you’re set. The other day we were out testing and we had marginal conditions to start with and ended with 28knts, all was fine through the range but time will tell. You can however tune the gearing “feel” by rotating the cam on the wand shaft, rotating the cam forward delays switch-off and increases lift so your wand will be more forward, shorter and so faster acting. Backing off the rotation means switch-off is earlier with the cam producing less lift so the wand will be more angled back and longer to maintain good ride height so the action will be a bit slower or softer.

Anyway the next step (and some are doing this now) is to fit this system into a bowsprit, not so much as I think that the bowsprit is that important, but it’s a neat way fit the system to the boats, and any extra control gained by the bowsprit registering greater pitch movement can’t hurt. This will be completed by end of January so stay tuned.

Merry Christmas,

Phil ‘Bugs’Smith